Generally, Springsteen's first official 7" single is regarded Blinded By The Light / Angel (US Columbia 4-45805), released close to a half-century ago today (02/23/1973) and cut in a shortened length (3 : 58) from the debut album GREETINGS FROM ASBURY PARK, N. J. (US Columbia KC 31903). The white-label version of mono/stereo coupling was also issued for promotional purposes. Both editions have earned their status as collectors' items, with the regular stock being extremely difficult to obtain due to the scarcity and a high cost (sometimes reaching a four-digit U.S. dollar price on the collectors' market). However, as you collectors know, the phrase "first official 7" single" is not true in a strict sense because more than a month in advance of the regular release (01/12/1973), the full-length, unedited version (5 : 05) already appeared on a special 7-inch sampler (US Columbia AS 45) as part of Columbia/Epic Records' program called Play:Back.
Shown are two examples of the Play:Back advertisement (below two) found on Columbia's company sleeves designed like a newspaper (titled "The Inner Sleeve"), gathering short articles and information on the label's artists. The left two images are from Volume 72A3/4 and the right two from Volume 72A4/4, both coming in two early U.S. pressings of the GREETINGS album (matrix number suffixes: -1A/-2A and -1C/-2C, respectively). Springsteen and his debut album are featured on Volume 73A1/4. |
Lost in the puzzle of "Which disc came with which booklet." |
If my memory is correct, it was the Lost In The Flood website among collectors' databases that first attempted to clarify and provided the accurate information on this issue. My first e-mail correspondence to the website dating back to June 2003 was, in fact, to ask for an opinion on "Which booklet came with which disc" [By the way, according to the reply from an web administrator (Peter), I was the first collector to contact the website from the Far East]. Although not updated since 2015, according to the current listing on the website, the correct combination between the three 7" titles and accompanying booklets is like the left image, which has been the consensus among vinyl collectors (though the discs are actually not vinyl-pressing but styrene-molded). I think, however, there is one more booklet that is considered for the Blinded By The Light single on the Play:Back series. I'm not talking about the one, most likely accompanied by the mega-rare white-label promo disc and featuring Springsteen and the band members on the black & white cover (taken during an August 1973 photo session for the second album).
— To be continued to Part 4 / back to Part 1 or Part 2.
Hi there. This is Peter, former co-webmaster of the "Lost In The Flood" website. First of all, I would like to compliment you on your outstanding research work, which really is second to none. Although I have stopped collecting Bruce and sold my entire collection about 7 years ago (as well as quitting "LITF"), I still keep checking out your blog on a regular basis. In regards to the "Play:Back" booklet with the band cover you mentioned in the above article, this actually does exist, and I have hi-res scans of it that unfortunately didn't make it onto the website anymore. The booklet also featured a piece called "A Critic's Look At Bruce Springsteen" on its inside pages.
ReplyDeleteGlad to hear from the great former Webmaster. Thank you so much for your comments, and I always admire your long-time efforts in running the website all those years, which undoubtedly has made a great impact and contribution to the world of Springsteen collectors (I do know it's a tough work as I had run my own website long before launching the current blog). The information obtained from the web pages, especially that through European collectors, was invaluable and quite helpful, and it was really fascinating and enjoyable to visit and read there. Taking this opportunity, I'd like to say my big thank-you to you and your pals. As for the scanned images, yes, I'd appreciate receiving them as I don't own that particular copy.
DeleteI like to share this moment to thank you both for providing the necessity for record collectors and collecting journalism alike. The depth of information is concise. I look forward to future postings. Thank you
ReplyDeleteThank you so much for your comments!
DeleteI'm really glad to have the responses like yours, a major source of the continuing driving force for blogging, though not able to write posts frequently under the current severe situation.
I concur with you given the global situation, do you foresee yourself posting international Springsteen collection's with such detail. As a long time collector from Canada, resources from your blog are valuable to learn from. Best regards Timothy
DeleteTimothy, thank you so much for posting such nice comments!
DeleteThere is a question I have been curious about 7" discs from Columbia Records of Canada for a long time (as I don't own any). Compared to the U.S. 7" releases (mostly fragile styrene molding, as I reported here), I read somewhere (or heard) that the Canadian counterparts are vinyl pressing, including Springsteen's. Is this true, or do you know anything about this?
Hello manatthetop, interesting background with respects to the fragile styrene molding. The production plant was based in Don Mills, Toronto Ontario from 1971 to 1988 before it became Sony Canada Inc. The plant was capable to produce 100,000 of vinyl and distribute nation wide. My understanding from a former CBS representative that all vinyl produced were vinyl. However, the Lp's records at the later end of the plant existence were more flimsy in nature and lighter and warp over a period of time. I be happy to send you copies of 7" Canadian Springsteen pressings at no cost. I'm not sure how you can defer to a regular email (personal information) than to use this medium to communicate further. I'm not a Blogger specialist. Regards, Timothy
ReplyDeleteHi Timothy, thanks a lot for your very informative reply. So, the Canadian 7" discs are probably rarer in quantity and better in quality than the U.S. counterparts, I guess. And for further communications, please send PM to me at manattop@gmail.com when you can.
DeleteHello manathtetop! Thank you so much for your detailed info. I just ran across your blog as I was trying to figure out which Play:Back booklet went with the AS66 record. With the photo you posted I was able to match it up. I only have (7) of the Play:Back records (65, 66, 69, 70, 75, 78 + 81). I see from your photo's you have similar issues. Would it be too much to ask which booklets go with each? I thought the Johnny Winter one would go with AS66 because he was on the record but I see that I am wrong. I have Johnny, Janis Ian, Edgar Winter, Mott The Hoople, The Andrew Sisters, Santana and of course the Epic's New Voices of 1974. You time with this matter is greatly appreciated. Still rockin' in Cleveland.. Peace Out!
ReplyDeleteHello Clevolo,
DeleteThank you for your contact. Yes, the Play:Back's disc/booklet combination issue has annoyed and confused vinyl collectors for years. As I wrote in the blog, two factors make it further complex: a few booklet varieties for the same discs in some releases; and artificially made-up disc/booklet combinations during circulation at used markets.
I'm sorry, but I don't think I can help you with this because I have not examined non-Springsteen issues thoroughly. However, I strongly suggest you check eBay auctions and relevant databases such as Popsike, and vinyl disc databases like Discog for full packages, including the mailing envelope, questionnaire cards, and booklet, to avoid the abovementioned artificial combination. However, please note that every database contains misinformation and errors.
Here's just my thought on your copies:
AS65: no idea
AS66: Issue 38; Some copies may have come with Issue 39.
AS69: Issue 39 w/ J. Winter on the front cover.
AS70: Issue 40 w/ J. Ian on front.
AS75: Issue 41 featuring E. Winter on front and customers' reviews on AS66.
AS78, AS81: no idea
Thanks for the quick response and feedback. I was able to narrow it down from your comments and have only 2 left to research or if I go by the number sequences it's a 50/50 chance I'll guess right. Thanks again!
ReplyDelete