As I mentioned in my previous blog post (
09/04/2025), I’ll introduce two articles here that reported on this classic bootleg, published in early and mid-1979 — likely shortly after it began circulating in the collector's market (the authors appear to be unidentified).
|  | 
| The last issue (March 1979) takes a look at the state of the bootleg industry.
 | 
The first appeared in 
Bomp!, a 
U.S. music magazine based in 
Burbank, north of downtown 
Los Angeles, 
California, that ran from 1971 to 1979. In its 
March 1979 issue (No. 21, the final issue), there is an article titled 
SPECIAL REPORT: BOOTLEGGERS — Rock Robin Hoods or Commie Threat? which includes an interview with an anonymous bootlegger along with reviews of recent bootleg releases (pp. 22–23). The bootlegger, described in the article as
 “
one of the kingpins of this secret industry,” admitted to regularly releasing three or four albums a month and maintaining a catalog of nearly 100 past titles, considering themself one of the “
Majors” in the underground record business. In the interview, the bootlegger also mentions Springsteen once, when asked why “
today’s bootlegs seem to be so much more nicely packaged than those white jacket with paper insert things of a few years ago,” even though the question refers not specifically to Springsteen’s bootlegs but to others, such as Beatles or Stones titles:
  
(excerpted) Personally I feel the risks involved make the bucks more than well-earned — but also as an opportunity to make a mark in history with some really fine albums that we, the fans, and even the artists, can be proud of. There are in fact many artists such as Bruce Springsteen and Patti Smith, who have openly encouraged bootleggers.*